Posts tagged as:

Global Perspectives

In my Microeconomics class way back at the beginning of my part-time MBA program at GW School of Business I came across a fascinating case on the topic of competitive firms and markets. The case was in my textbook – Microeconomics (5th Edition),by Jeffrey M. Perloff .

We are all very familiar with outsourcing, offshoring and other implications of globalization. There is no question that labor cost arbitrage is a significant factor for companies to stay competitive in the new realities of global markets. And unless you are a victim of layoffs caused by outsourcing, you can fully appreciate “every day low prices” at your nearby big-box store or even not so big local vendor.

However, this particular case from the textbook got my attention because it was not about outsourcing of production of textiles or electronics and everything in between – the usual suspects. It was about the fine art, namely the paintings. The case was titled “Enter the Dragon: Masses Producing Art for the Masses”.

The general premise in the case is that due to falling communication and shipping costs Chinese firms entered the world market for “fine arts”. As everything with China manufacturing for the global markets, this process is highly industrialized. There are actually multiple factories, not just small shops, that produce paintings of all sorts (from oil-painted renditions of classic Western artist to “original” paintings of puppies, still life and landscapes) on mass production scale.

One of the companies mentioned in the case has two factories employing 10 original designers, 250 painters and over 500 assistant and supportive workers, like framers. There was one such painter quoted in the case who at the age of 26 has already painted about 20,000 copies of van Gogh’s works.

Apparently, this mass production industry is driving out of business many independent artists around the world.

For me this case is especially interesting, because it hits very close to home. I am not an artist, but this talent runs in the family. Here is the press release I would like to share:

Maryland resident and local high school student, 17 year old artist Margarita will present her recent paintings and drawings at the Yellow Barn Gallery in Glen Echo Park on February 25th and 26th from 12-5pm both days. This is her third time presenting work at the Yellow Barn, but it is her first individual gallery exhibition. The show is an exposition of her body of work from the last four years, some of which has been previously shown at the Yellow Barn, and ranges from oil paintings to drawings, from portraits and figure studies to still lives and landscapes.

Tanner - Picture of the Horse, oil painting

Tanner - Picture of the Horse, oil painting by Margarita

Despite the range of work, there is a clear exploration of color and technique, and a maturity to the work that belies the age of the artist. Dedicated to technique, and extremely passionate about painting and drawing, Margarita has painted for almost 6 years, and had her first collective show at the age of 15 with the Yellow Barn High School Scholarship Class. She has had artwork included in “The Students of Glen Kessler” exhibition, as well as most recently, “The First Annual Yellow Barn Drawing Exhibition” alongside the works of Gavin Glakas, J. J. Bruns, and Walter Bartman last August.

This artist is remarkable not only because she is one of the thousands who withstand the Chinese competition around the world, but she also happens to be my daughter. Follow this link for a preview of some works that will be exhibited at the show. And if you happen to be around the area on those days, stop by at the Yellow Barn Gallery to enjoy the original fine art of the young and talented local artist.

{ 2 comments }

Moscow School of Management SKOLKOVO

Moscow School of Management SKOLKOVO

Just stumbled upon an interesting article in Economist - School of the dark arts. It is about, if not the best, at least the most touted, Russian business school – Moscow School of Management SKOLKOVO. The school has been known since its founding in 2006 as a pet project of the Russian government and the collaborating oligarchs. It has been well-funded, fiercely-promoted and frequently-attended by the Russian and international business and political celebrities, including Medvedev, Putin, Schwarzenegger and many others. The school is, in a very Russian, even if somewhat twisted way, a  response to the Harvards and LBS’s of the world.

The meat of the article is about a different perspective on business education taken by the school. That is, different from the approaches taken by the school’s Western counterparts. To quote the dean of the school, Wilfried Vanhonacker: “Western schools focus on knowledge. We focus on how to get things done.” Sounds very appealing on its face value, until you read further what it actually means in the context of an article. And it means that the school is preparing its graduates to function in so-called “difficult economies”, such as Russia, India, China and Brazil – the famous BRIC, which are typically plagued with “…institutional gaps, limited availability of talent and graft.”  To further confirm what it actually means, here is another quote from the article: “There is no ethical proselytising. …Skolkovo does not harbour “rather arrogant ambitions” to change Russia’s business environment.”

This approach to “getting the things done” is in a quite stark contrast to the latest trends in the Western business education with emphasis on sustainability, corporate social responsibility and ethics. For reference, read my post about the interview with the dean of George Washington School of Business that touches upon these issues at GWSB, and more broadly in American business education.

What is even more interesting, this “down to earth, get your hands dirty” approach of SKOLKOVO is contradictory to the very aspirations and proclamations of Wilfried Vanhonacker, the school’s dean,  just two short years ago. In 2009 he made on the list of 100 Most Influential People in Business Ethics published by Ethisphere, “a leading international think-tank dedicated to the creation, advancement and sharing of best practices in business ethics, corporate social responsibility, anti-corruption and sustainability.”

Vanhonacker was listed under category Thought Leadership and credited with the SKOLKOVO’s announcement “that it will focus on anti-corruption, a welcome change to the high profile reports of alleged corruption that came from Russia [that] year.”

As the article in Economist states, “the school unabashedly takes a different perspective from its Western counterparts.” Apparently, the reverence to the anti-corruption and business ethics sentiment in 2009 was done only sheepishly. ;-(

{ 0 comments }

The Businessweek online has recently placed a video interview with the dean of the George Washington University School of Business – Doug Guthrie,  who answers this question. The highlights of the GWU Business School approach to business education, as per dean’s interview, are the corporate social responsibility, sustainability, ethics and global perspective. These core elements need to be embedded into the business education, and this is the aspiration of the GWSB faculty and administration. The dean also emphasized again the unique location of the school that allows to it to effectively embed all those aspects into its curriculum and total student experience. By the way, this location advantage is also reflected in the tag line of GWSB: “In the Center of It All.”

From personal experience, I know that additional sustainability and international elective courses are required for graduation, on top of the core curriculum courses, and international or global business cases are extensively included into most of my courses in school. I have seen the roster of elective courses on sustainability and corporate responsibility offered in the school and it seems rather adequate to me. However, I have heard at least one of my classmates complaining that there were not enough sustainability courses available at school. As a matter of fact, the complaint I heard was in fall 2010, and since then the business school seems to have increased the offerings in sustainability domain according to the article in the George Washington University newspaper – the GW Hatchet.

For me it is hard to objectively evaluate this, since I don’t know what other schools offer in this area. But The Aspen Institute publishes its biennial ranking of Business School – Beyond the Grey Pinstripes – measuring them on “the integration of issues concerning social and environmental stewardship into the curriculum”. According to that ranking GWSB holds position 9 in the US, and 11 – internationally, out of 149 business schools participating in the surveys that lead to the ranking. Which means that our school does something right or, that many other schools are even less concerned with the “social and environmental stewardship” issues.

Interestingly, Harvard Business School is not included in the ranking, reportedly because they did not participate in the survey. Speaking of the “rankings fatigue” ;-) . Anyways, embedded at the end of this post is the interview from Businessweek. If you have other “why’s?” about MBA, here is my post on “Why Part-time MBA?”  

{ 1 comment }

Recently I read an article in Businessweek on Russia and its BRIC membership. For those who are mostly focused on the affairs of the developed word, BRIC is the acronym for Brazil, Russia, India, China. The term has come into use in 2001 as a symbol of the shift of the global economic power away from the developed G7 economies toward the developing world – as the Wikipedia article indicates.


The general idea expressed in the article is that Russia did not live up to the great expectations of becoming the new economic powerhouse or, as the article puts it, ”developing into a mature economy”. Neither did it become an attractive investment haven. Therefore some investments analysts from various financial institutions are calling for dropping Russia from the BRIC and adding Indonesia to the  ”Big Four” instead.

When I was reading the article I could not help but remember about the group research paper we prepared in our MBA Global Perspectives class on Risk Analysis of Foreign Direct Investments (FDI) in Russia. Many of the arguments brought up in the article are the same things we have been pointing out in our paper. Even with all the cautionary recommendations we had, I would not think at the time that some hot headed analysts, or maybe conversly cool headed, would suggest that Russia’s anemic economic development disqualifies it from being considered one of the emerging economic super powers.

Admittedly, I would not invest  my own money in Russia at any rate. Apparently, people who consider putting their money abroad are paying more attention on the ongoing affairs there and have already become wary of all the promising, but never materializing hopes of economic breakthrough and setting political stability.  

Once I read the article I decided to publish the write up on Political Climate in Russia that I prepared for that MBA research paper. Here are the retrospective posts when I still was working on the paper: finalizing Russia risk analysis  and more on preparing for the research paper. There are some additional facts and references in that research that could shed more light on the political situation in Russia and its adverse effect on foreign investments, direct or otherwise. The research is placed in the Business School Cases section of this blog – Political Climate in Russia and FDI.

{ 2 comments }

Spring Term Module 1 Grades In

March 22, 2010

On Monday I finally got my grades for Global Perspectives. The Managerial Accounting grade came within a couple of days after the final exam. I waited to get both grades before posting on that. Both grades came as a surprise to me: a pleasant one and somewhat disappointing, even though I got straight B’s in both classes. [...]

Read the full article →

Global Perspectives Final Exam – Done

March 6, 2010

Yesterday I had my last final exam in module one of the Spring Term at GWSB – Global Perspectives. Overall exam was not very difficult, especially given its open book, notes, internet access format. There was only one question I somehow had missed during the course regarding “foreignness liability”. Thanks to internet access I was [...]

Read the full article →

Toyota Scandal – New Case Candidate for MBA Textbooks

February 16, 2010

Update 9/17/2010: I posted a business case write up “Toyota Recalls and Public Relations Management Crisis” which I had prepared for my Business and Public Policy class in summer 2010. With this scandal unravelling in the last 3 weeks about Toyota recalls connected to the sticking accelerator pedal, and speculations about how much and for how [...]

Read the full article →

Political Climate for FDI in Russia-Risk Analysis Study

January 31, 2010

Updated 11/30/2010. I published my section of the research paper on Risk Analysis Study of FDI in Russia: Political Climate in Russia and FDI. I feel like a squeezed lemon: exhausted and despondent. The whole weekend I have been working on my part 0f the group research paper on FDI in Russia. I had to cover Political [...]

Read the full article →

Global Perspectives – FDI in Russia

January 24, 2010

Updated 11/30/2010. I published my section of the research paper on Risk Analysis Study of FDI in Russia: Political Climate in Russia and FDI. Spent all day today digging up the material for my group research paper on FDI in Russia. There is a lot of information available on the internet, arguably of various levels [...]

Read the full article →

Spring Term Part-time MBA at GWU – Week 2

January 21, 2010

Finished the second week of classes in my first module of Spring Term. The intensity is picking up just a little bit, but so far very manageable. It’s probably going to change this weekend when I will have work on two major projects: I am planning to work on my section for Risk Analysis Group Paper [...]

Read the full article →

Global Perspectives at GWSB

January 8, 2010

A couple of days ago I received a welcome email from professor who is going to teach Global Perspectives, one of the two core MBA courses I signed up for in the first half of the Spring semester. The syllabus and other materials have been placed on the Blackboard and we are expected to come ready for the first [...]

Read the full article →